Daksha's Anger and the Higher Duty
After both groups of his sons chose renunciation, Daksha confronted Narada with intense anger. From Daksha's perspective, the universal need for population growth had been sabotaged, and his familial aspirations had been nullified. He accused Narada of irresponsibility and disrespect, arguing that the sage's influence had derailed essential duties. In response, Narada remained composed, accepting the curse to wander without fixed residence and reaffirming his commitment to guiding souls toward ultimate good.
This exchange highlighted the tension between material obligation and spiritual priority. Daksha saw progeny as a sacred duty; Narada prioritized awakening dormant spiritual aspiration. The narrative invites readers to examine whether duties serve transient aims or eternal welfare. It suggests that genuine guidance sometimes disrupts comfortable expectations, prompting seekers to reconsider whether their pursuits align with the soul's true destination.
Despite Daksha's anger, the text underscores that Narada's intervention was compassionate rather than reckless. By prompting reflection, he liberated the Haryashvas and Savalashvas from endless cycles of birth and death, redirecting them toward self-realization. Daksha's curse—intended as punishment—became Narada's empowerment, enabling him to travel freely and share wisdom more widely. The episode reframes apparent conflict as an instrument for broader spiritual benefit.
The chapter closes with Daksha reconsidering the hierarchy of duties. While material responsibilities have their place, they must be contextualized within the ultimate purpose of the soul. Narada's fearlessness serves as a model for teachers: compassion sometimes requires challenging cherished plans, trusting that aligning with the Supreme's intent ultimately serves all beings better than temporary gains.